{"id":1082,"date":"2025-08-07T09:00:57","date_gmt":"2025-08-07T15:00:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/tidbitsofaudacity.com\/wordpress\/?p=1082"},"modified":"2025-08-07T09:00:58","modified_gmt":"2025-08-07T15:00:58","slug":"the-red-assault-on-the-family","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/tidbitsofaudacity.com\/wordpress\/index.php\/2025\/08\/07\/the-red-assault-on-the-family\/","title":{"rendered":"The Red Assault on the Family"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

A History of Ideology and Intent<\/em><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Grainger<\/strong> holds a B.S. in Psychology and is currently earning his Master\u2019s in Clinical Mental Health Counseling at Liberty University. He\u2019s an active men\u2019s ministry leader and pastoral counselor with over 5 years of experience, currently seeing clients in both faith-based and clinical settings.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Karina<\/strong> holds a Master\u2019s degree in Behavioral Science with concentrations in mental health, counseling, marriage and family therapy, career development, and child and adolescent therapy. She has a robust research background and is board-certified in brain health, ADHD, sensory processing, and wellness. She, too, actively sees clients in clinical practice.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Together, we represent both the psychological and pastoral lenses on today\u2019s mental health landscape. We are deeply committed to truth over trend, accountability over blame, and growth over grievance. In this article, we explore how communism has historically undermined the structure and values of the American family. Combining historical evidence with lived experience, Karina\u2019s firsthand memories of life under communism and Jason\u2019s work as a counselor, we expose how communist ideology weakens faith, parental authority, and generational bonds. Our shared commitment to protecting the American family drives this important conversation.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

What you are about to read is Grainger\u2019s reflection on the historical agenda to dismantle the family, paired with Karina\u2019s lived testimony of the very communism some in Gen Z now idealize; an ideology that seeks to unravel the foundational merits of the family.<\/em> <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Grainger<\/em><\/h4>\n\n\n\n

I\u2019ll get right to it. No fluff. The attack on the family isn\u2019t new. And it isn\u2019t accidental. It was intentional, particularly by proponents of communism.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Even before the Communist Manifesto<\/em>, Robert Owen, founder of the \u201cYankee Utopians\u201d, wrote that the absurdity of religion and marriage, founded on individual property, were total monstrosities.1<\/a> Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels often wrote about the destruction, dissolution, and abolition of the family. Marx once wrote,<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cThe hallowed correlation of parent and child is disgusting.\u201d<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

The Russian Orthodox Church had long prohibited divorce. But with the Bolshevik rise to power, that prohibition was eliminated, causing an explosion in divorce rates. The dismantling of the family opened the door for Lenin to implement his system of terror. Very early on, it was understood that marriage was the greatest impediment to implementing communism in any society.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bolshevik theorist Aleksandra Kollontai wrote:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cBut the joys of parenthood will not be taken away from those who are capable of appreciating them. That is, from those mothers and fathers who happily accept that the best educators are not the parents, but the collective, not the sanctuary of the home, but the supremacy of the state. The children would be reared by society. Children would be wards of the state<\/strong>.\u201d<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Margaret Sanger<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Then there\u2019s Margaret Sanger, who is not winning \u201cMother of the Year\u201d anytime soon, according to her son, Grant. She is best known for her quiet campaign to eradicate the Black population. Critics twist her infamous line, \u201cWe do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population\u201d<\/em> in an attempt to preserve the reputation of someone they call a hero. Unfortunately, in 1926, this hero<\/em> went on to give a speech to the Klu Klux Klan in Silver Lake, New Jersey, likely repeating such rhetoric.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But who was she? Well, besides being an openly neglectful mother, she joyfully told her husband she would be sexually free whether he liked it or not. Such \u201cfreedom\u201d was a movement championed by Emma Goldman, who was eventually deported by President Wilson. Margaret\u2019s first of many affairs was with Goldman.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

After destroying her marriage, she went on to destroy other marriages, having numerous affairs with men across Europe, including H. G. Wells, who was infatuated with the \u201cCandid, fair, and honest Joseph Stalin.\u201d<\/em> Wells was also an admirer of Lenin.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

When the racial eugenicist herself wrote a June 1935 article titled, \u201cBirth Control in Russia\u201d<\/em>, this was the first clear indication of the ideological blueprint she wanted to embed in American consciousness. She originally began American Birth Control League, later renamed Planned Parenthood, to rid the earth of \u201cIdiots, morons, imbeciles, and the mentally and physically defective.\u201d<\/em> What a Mother Teresa she was. Ironically, Sanger was startled by how many abortions were taking place in Russia. She was for eugenics and birth control, but not abortion so much. She eventually made the statement,<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cA functioning Communistic society will ensure the happiness of every child and will assume the full responsibility for its welfare and education.\u201d<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

There, she leaks her true intention of the child being property of the state.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But abortion had already spun out of control, to the point that Stalin himself, one of the deadliest men in world history, had to ban abortion after observing the catastrophic population decline. And Sanger\u2019s mission to export this ideology to America was unwavering. The family, once a cornerstone of civilization, had become a liability to communism. The Communist Party of the Soviet Union had declared the family a \u201cformidable stronghold of all the turpitudes of the old regime.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Educational Infection<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Ralph de Toledano, a historian who studied Columbia University\u2019s interest in communism with comprehensive tenacity, wrote,<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cThe primary method [to wage warfare on Western civilization] would be to saturate Western culture with the miasma of unrestrained sex. The destruction of the West, from which a Marxist utopia would arise, was to be achieved through a mass brainwashing of neo-Marxism, wrapped up in what euphemistically became known as Critical Theory<\/strong>.\u201d<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Toledano identified the two greatest obstacles to a Marxist utopia are God<\/strong> and family<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The architects of Communism\u2019s infiltration of the West declared the primary focus was the education system, getting na\u00efve American parents to hand over their children to the universities for ideological reprogramming.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Kate Millett<\/em><\/h4>\n\n\n\n

Introducing Kate Millet, a student at Columbia University, where she earned her PhD and wrote her most famous book Sexual Politics<\/em>. She grew up deeply troubled. She frequently had psychotic episodes that included several attempts to kill her sister, Mallory.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I\u2019ll leave you with this enlightening bit of information. To show you where this issue really is, here is an excerpt from a gathering among university professors, led by Kate Millet, where she led a chilling chant. Millet\u2019s sister, Mallory, detailed the following chant at an event she attended:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Kate Millet (KM): \u201cWhy are we here today?\u201d the chairwoman asked.<\/p>

Group (G): \u201cTo make revolution,\u201d they answered.<\/p>

(KM): \u201cWhat kind of revolution?\u201d<\/p>

(G): \u201cThe Cultural Revolution,\u201d they chanted.<\/p>

(KM): \u201cAnd how do we make Cultural Revolution?\u201d<\/p>

(G): \u201cBy destroying the American family!\u201d<\/p>

(KM): \u201cHow do we destroy the family?\u201d<\/p>

(G): \u201cBy destroying the American patriarch,\u201d they cried exuberantly.<\/p>

(KM): \u201cAnd how do we destroy the American patriarch?\u201d she probed.<\/p>

(G): \u201cBy taking away his power!\u201d<\/p>

(KM): \u201cHow do we do that?\u201d<\/p>

(G): \u201cBy destroying monogamy!\u201d they shouted.<\/p>

(KM): \u201cHow can we destroy monogamy?\u201d<\/p>

(G): \u201cBy promoting promiscuity, eroticism, prostitution, abortion, and homosexuality!\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Columbia University\u2019s Red Legacy<\/em><\/h4>\n\n\n\n

By the 1960s, Marxist ideology had a firm grip on universities, namely Columbia University, which is now no surprise. What did Columbia U produce?<\/p>\n\n\n\n